Rabbi Judah ha-Nasi (latter half of the second and beginning of the third century C.E.), considered to be the redactor of the Codification of basic Jewish Oral Law; edited and arranged by R. Judah ha-Nasi c. 200 C.E. Mishnah , made a statement that started a trend of legal development resulting in the elimination of the category of normal menstruation and its replacement by the category of abnormal bleeding, ziva. His statement reflects the possible confusion in keeping track of one’s period, especially in light of the new system of pithei niddah. If this was done intentionally, the couple incurred the punishment of karet; if done unintentionally, they were obligated to bring a sin offering. Atonement by sacrifice, however, could not be made after the destruction of the Temple in the year 70 C.E. Great efforts were therefore made to prevent inadvertent sins of this nature. Joseph citing Rav Judah who had it from Rav stated: Rabbi ordained at Sadot: If a woman observed a discharge on one day she must wait six days in addition to it. If she observed discharges on two days she must wait six days in addition to these. If she observed a discharge on three days she must wait seven clean days.”
Afterwards the guy endured so you can pray
It statement from the Rabbi Judah ha-Nasi fundamentally removed all menstruating females throughout the normal menstrual classification and you may placed them on the irregular status of zava since most typical symptoms past at the very least 3 days. Appear to his matter is one to given the state-of-the-art clarifications necessary to determine whenever one is niddah of course, if it’s possible to end up being good zava, you to might arrive at fail that have grievous consequences. First brand new decree got minimal perception; it appears to be to possess already been regional, and may even was limited by times when doubt was with it and also the regional population was not well enough discovered to decide during the such as points ( Rabbi Solomon ben Isaac; b. Troyes, France, 1040 Rashi ). Certainly it was not an over-all decree for all out of Israel, nevertheless try step one for the reason that direction. In the first a few advice, Rabbi’s declaration deals with a woman which tends to be a zava or may be a great niddah. She is addressed in the first circumstances since the a great niddah, that have an effective 7-big date age of impurity, in place of someday of impurity during the day out-of bleeding, the rule getting a zava. About 2nd analogy this woman is addressed since a good niddah and you can a zava if the first-day had been in the this lady ziva months (brand new eleven days between menstrual periods). About 3rd state, this woman is treated as the a whole zava. All the around three rulings make even more stringent position.
BT Niddah 66a gives us Rabbi’s report: “Roentgen
Subsequent statements by other sages make it absolutely certain that it was understood to be a general ent are from the amoraim, the sages who created the Palestinian and Babylonian Talmudim. Amoraim could not dispute tannaitic rulings without tannaitic support but https://datingmentor.org/tr/quiver-inceleme/ they created fences around the Torah to prevent inadvertent sins. We find a aic) “spokesman.” Scholars active during the period from the completion of the Mishnah (c. 200 C.E.) until the completion of the Jerusalem and Babylonian Talmuds (end of the fourth and fifth centuries respectively), who were active primarily in the interpretation of the Mishnah. In the chain of tradition they follow the tanna’im and precede the savora’im. amora Rav Huna in JT Berakhot (5:1, 8d): “Rav Huna said: One who sees a drop of blood like [the size of a] mustard seed sits and keeps [because of it] seven clean days. ” The statement was made as an example of an undisputed law from which one could then turn to prayer. Such a law would clear one’s mind because there were no arguments about it, thereby allowing one to focus totally on prayer. Rav Huna’s statement is much more radical than the tannaitic version quoted above. According to him, all women who see uterine blood are in the category of the complete zava, regardless of the size of the blood stain and despite the normalcy of menstruation or having seen such blood only one or two days.